Skip to content

California FAIR Plan expands as insurers withdraw from lower-risk neighborhoods

California pushes insurance overhaul as FAIR Plan growth signals deep strain

California’s property insurance market shows growing strain as insurers retreat from areas once considered moderate wildfire risk. Thousands of homeowners now rely on the California FAIR Plan for basic insurance coverage.

The program was designed as a safety net for properties in high wildfire hazard zones where private insurers decline coverage.

Yet enrollment surged 43% between September 2024 and December 2025 after insurers pulled back following severe wildfire losses, including the $40 bn Los Angeles fire that destroyed about 12,000 homes.

Analysis of FAIR Plan data indicates the retreat now extends beyond high-risk terrain.

Roughly 14% of policies issued by the plan cover properties located mainly in urban areas with relatively low wildfire exposure. Those properties account for about 28% of the plan’s total insured exposure.

Michael Wara, director of the climate and energy policy program at Stanford University, said the contraction in high-risk zones now spreads across broader parts of the insurance market.

California’s insurance system faces structural pressure from wildfire losses and regulatory constraints. Insurers often wait a year or longer to receive approval for premium increases under the state’s regulated pricing framework.

Regulators now promise faster approval processes and more flexibility for rate adjustments reflecting wildfire exposure. Officials hope these changes encourage insurers to expand coverage in higher-risk areas.

At the same time, lawmakers are advancing additional reforms following the Los Angeles wildfire disaster.

Many homeowners reported underinsurance after claims processes began, prompting proposals aimed at strengthening consumer protection.

One legislative proposal would require insurers to issue or renew policies for homeowners who upgrade their properties with wildfire resilience improvements. Companies declining coverage could face suspension from writing new business in California for up to five years.

Another proposal would require insurers to offer guaranteed replacement coverage for homes destroyed in disasters.

Ricardo Lara supports separate legislation allowing the FAIR Plan to provide broader insurance protection.

Currently the program offers fire coverage only, meaning homeowners must purchase separate policies to cover other risks.

The FAIR Plan now insures nearly 10% of residential properties across California. Expanding its coverage could increase its appeal compared with traditional insurers.

Industry groups warn the balance between regulation and market incentives remains delicate.

Mark Sektnan of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association said legislative decisions will shape whether insurers view California as an attractive market for renewed underwriting.

Experts increasingly see California as a testing ground for insurance market responses to climate-driven catastrophe risk. Similar pressures linked to hurricanes, floods, and wildfires are emerging across other U.S. states.