Skip to content

Colorado ACA premiums set to jump 101% after Senate subsidy deadlock

Colorado ACA premiums set to jump 101% after Senate subsidy deadlock

More than 200,000 Colorado residents are edging toward a sharp rise in health insurance costs after the US Senate failed to extend federal subsidies that lower monthly premiums for people who buy coverage on their own.

The Senate split evenly on two competing proposals. Democrats backed a three-year extension of the enhanced subsidies.

Republicans offered an alternative built around government-funded health savings accounts, with no subsidy extension. Both plans drew 51 votes, nine short of the 60 required to move forward.

Colorado’s senators, Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, supported the Democratic plan and opposed the Republican one. The stalemate leaves the enhanced subsidies set to expire at year-end.

Roughly 225,000 Coloradans stand to be affected. People can still enroll in plans that start Jan. 1, and open enrollment for 2026 coverage runs until Jan. 15. But pricing, absent action, shifts dramatically.

State regulators estimate that average premiums for people shopping without employer coverage will rise 101% in 2026. Those receiving no subsidies at all will see average increases near 23%.

People who only qualified for the enhanced credits face the steepest jump, since they would now cover the full cost of their plans.

The Colorado Division of Insurance warned earlier this year that as many as 75,000 residents could drop coverage if subsidies lapse.

So far, exchange enrollment is running about 5% below last year’s pace. In 2024, a record 282,000 people enrolled through the state marketplace.

The enhanced subsidies date back to the COVID period and build on the Affordable Care Act’s original premium credits.

As healthcare costs climbed with inflation, the added support kept coverage within reach for many households.

Geography matters. Because of how subsidies interact with higher base premiums, rural Coloradans are projected to face even larger average increases than residents along the Front Range.

Hickenlooper said the outcome runs counter to what most voters want. He said the vote will push costs higher for a large share of the state, adding financial pressure at a moment when many households already feel stretched.

Bennet went further, criticizing Republicans and President Donald Trump for letting the issue drift. He said consumers should have had clarity weeks ago while choosing plans. Each day without action, he said, narrows the options.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune argued before the vote that extending subsidies without broader changes misses the point. He said Democrats focus on messaging while underlying healthcare costs keep rising under Obamacare.

This is insane. People were supposed to be making their decisions a month ago about what insurance they were going to buy. So every day that goes by, it just becomes harder and harder and harder to address.

In remarks prior to Thursday’s vote, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, criticized Democrats for wanting to extend the subsidies without tying it to deeper reforms to the health care system.

“I hope that after today, they’ll feel like they’ve checked the messaging box and will get serious about actually doing something about the spiraling health care costs under Obamacare,” Thune said.

Colorado’s senators rejected that framing. Both say the current system fails too many people and argue that healthcare should be treated as a right with universal access.

Bennet accused the administration and congressional Republicans of underestimating the fallout. He said voters will not miss who made the call once premiums double.

Hickenlooper added that small businesses feel the impact too. Many employers stopped offering health insurance once subsidies made individual coverage more attractive for workers. About half of people buying coverage on their own either work for small firms or are unemployed.

When premiums spike, he said, anxiety follows. That spills into the workplace.

The subsidy fight also drove last fall’s 43-day federal government shutdown. Senate Democrats initially refused to fund the government without a subsidy extension. The shutdown ended after a deal promised a vote on the issue. That vote failed.

Hickenlooper said the standoff still mattered. He pointed to a recent poll showing more than 80% of people who buy their own insurance want the subsidies extended, including more than 70% of MAGA-aligned conservatives.

“It creates a level of anxiety for your workers,” Hickenlooper said of the rising insurance costs. “How your employees feel about their lives has a lot to do with your success.”

If the credits expire, 76% of those buyers said they would blame Trump or congressional Republicans. Even within Republican voters, blame splits.

Hickenlooper said that kind of pressure forces movement. He noted growing Republican discussion around alternatives such as health savings accounts and other reforms.

According to Beinsure analysts, the Colorado numbers preview what many states face if Congress stays stuck. Premium shocks don’t wait for political resolution. They arrive on renewal notices.