Skip to content

Black Sea sanctioned tanker attacks push war risk premiums higher for shippers

Black Sea sanctioned tanker attacks push war risk premiums higher for shippers

War risk premiums for Black Sea shipping ticked higher after Ukrainian naval drones struck two sanctioned tankers headed to Novorossiysk, according to Reuters.

The route is already one of the world’s most sensitive freight corridors – grain, crude and refined products all move through these waters shared by Ukraine, Russia, Turkey, Romania, Georgia and Bulgaria – and the latest attacks shook underwriters into repricing exposure almost immediately.

According to Beinsure, seven-day war risk rates for vessels calling at Ukrainian ports climbed to about 0.5% of hull value, up from roughly 0.4% a week earlier.

Insurance coverage for Russian Black Sea ports, which traditionally sits at a higher band, moved into the 0.65-0.8% range versus around 0.6% last week.

For operators already dealing with volatile freight and tight capacity, the shift adds yet another cost layer to voyages that were expensive even before the weekend.

The two tankers targeted by drones were empty and sailing toward Novorossiysk to load oil bound for overseas buyers.

An official from Ukraine’s Security Service told Reuters the strikes were intentional – part of an ongoing effort to squeeze Russian oil revenue and disrupt its export system.

Black Sea sanctioned tanker attacks push war risk premiums higher for shippers

This aligns with what many war-risk specialists have been whispering for months: Ukraine appears to be widening the map of potential strike points.

Munro Anderson, operations head at Vessel Protect, said underwriters are adjusting to a new assessment of intent and capability.

As Ukrainian attacks increase in frequency and geography, insurers are pricing in a broader list of potential hit zones and a higher probability of repeat incidents.

Anderson added that more Ukrainian activity also raises the odds of a reciprocal Russian move, shifting the overall risk gradient across trades more evenly than the market has seen lately.

Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan called the attacks on commercial ships “unacceptable” and warned all sides.

The vessels hit this week were the first non-military, non-Russian-flagged ships struck in international waters, said naval analyst Andrii Ryzhenko, who previously served as deputy chief of staff for Ukraine’s navy.

He argued it’s unlikely Russia will strike commercial traffic moving toward Ukraine in the territorial waters of Turkey, Bulgaria or Romania, since any such action would risk a clash with NATO.

They’re (Russia) attacking (vessels) all of the time, at least in Ukrainian territorial waters and using different types of weapons.

The Black Sea isn’t the only hotspot. Maritime security teams have tracked at least seven blasts on tankers that previously called at Russian ports since December 2024, including incidents in the Mediterranean.

Investigators suspect Ukrainian involvement, though Kyiv rarely comments on these operations. A Turkish-owned tanker damaged off Senegal last week was hit by four external explosions.

Early assessments suggest limpet mines (consistent with prior attacks) but officials in Dakar said the exact cause will be disclosed once the investigation wraps.

For now, ships are still sailing, but operators are budgeting for longer delays, more routing detours and premium creep. The war risk market has a habit of moving in small steps until a single event forces a leap; insurers say the last few weeks look uncomfortably close to that tipping point.

According to Beinsure data, Ukrainian naval drones struck two tankers in the Black Sea as they sailed empty toward Novorossiysk, one of Russia’s key oil export terminals. Both vessels were under Western sanctions and were en route to load crude for foreign buyers.

The strike marked a shift because the vessels weren’t Russian-flagged and were hit in international waters, a domain that had largely avoided direct confrontation until now.

The third tanker reported coming under attack 130 kilometers (80 miles) off the Turkish coast on Tuesday but did not make a request for assistance and was proceeding toward Türkiye’s Sinop port, the Maritime Affairs Directorate said on the social media platform X.

Tribeca said the ship had been attacked by a drone. It was not immediately clear who had attacked the ship and Türkiye’s Maritime Affairs Directorate did not provide additional details.

The authority said the ship was sailing from Russia to Georgia, while Tribeca said it was bound for Mersin. Both said the ship was now en route to Sinop without assistance.

“The necessary messages were conveyed to the relevant parties, including Ukrainian authorities,” a Turkish official said when asked for comment, but gave no further details.

Maritime analysts say this broadens the risk map for commercial shipping, especially for tankers with any link to Russian trade. Underwriters responded quickly.

For Ukraine, the operation fits a pattern of using drones and sabotage to pressure the Russian energy supply chain far beyond the front lines.

For shipowners, the calculus is getting harder. Each new strike adds uncertainty to a region already thick with military activity, geopolitical tension and long-running questions about how far the conflict might spill into broader maritime trade.