Beinsure Media ⭐ Insurance & InsurTech Insights

Insurance Europe: EU must stay on course to deliver Solvency II

Insurance Europe: EU must stay on course to deliver Solvency II

Insurance Europe has called on the European Commission to ensure that the forthcoming technical work on Solvency II – the EU’s prudential regime that regulates the industry – fully reflects the political agreement made in December 2023.

The federation of insurance associations welcomed the changes agreed by the EU co-legislators that reduce current excessive solvency requirements and unlock capital.

This increases the capacity for the industry to provide more protection for citizens and businesses and investment into the European economy.

Delivering on the agreed ambitions for the Solvency II review, published just before the European Parliament’s plenary vote on the topic led by rapporteur Markus Ferber MEP, Insurance Europe outlines the key outcomes needed and their benefits.

Help insurers better serve customers, unlock more investment for the green and digital transitions, and support progress towards completing the EU’s Capital Markets Union, while maintaining the very high level of policyholder protection of the framework

Angus SCORGIE, Head of Prudential Regulation and International Affairs

However, to realize the potential benefits, the industry warns of the importance of ensuring that the additional technical work closely reflects the high ambition of the political agreement and upholds the EU’s commitment to reduce reporting burden.

The document explains the industry arguments and expectations on key points such as:

On 23rd April the European Parliament approved the revision of the Solvency II Directive and the introduction of the Directive on the recovery and resolution of insurance and reinsurance undertakings (IRRD) into the EU legal order.

These legal changes were informally agreed in December. The revision of Solvency II was approved by 549 votes to 56, with 9 abstentions. On the other hand, 475 MEPs voted in favour of the IRRD, 37 were against and 99 abstained.

   by Nataly Kramer

Exit mobile version